|
Bank Branch Statutory Audit Certain Aspects
|
-
Deposit Account
-
New Accounts Opened
-
Verify that the Know Your Customer (‘KYC’)
norms are complied with
-
In case of NRE and FCNR deposit account, the
Branch should hold valid, current copies of the Passport and Visas of the
account holders
-
Examine unusual trend in account opening or
account closing, dormant accounts that have suddenly been reactivated by
heavy cash withdrawals or deposits, overdrawing, etc
-
Selectively verify if signature scanning is
pending for the saving/current/cash credit accounts
-
Accounts of different parties proposed by a
single person/ group
-
Account Operations
-
Selectively verify account ledger statements
for unusual/large/overdraft transactions
-
Large deposits placed at the end of the year
(probable window dressing)
-
Provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering
Act should be kept in mind to ensure that ‘suspicious’ transactions are
reported to the concerned authority
-
All cash receipts and cash withdrawals of Rs10
lakh and above should be reported to Regional Office. Accounts reflecting
frequent cash transactions of Rs10 lakh and above, should be examined along
with the nature of business of the entity
-
If term deposits are not in round figures,
ascertain the reason and vouch for accounting entries
-
Debit balance in Current and Saving accounts
should be examined in detail and the outstanding exceeding 90 days should be
provided for
-
Credit card accounts with debit balances
should be treated as loss assets, if they are outstanding for more than 90
days. Review the Master Circular on Maintenance of Deposit Accounts issued
by RBI from website www.rbi.org.in
-
Matured/overdue term deposit to be classified
as demand deposits Interest Rates on Renewal of such matured/overdue
deposits should be verified with reference to prevailing interest rates for
the period renewed. (To ensure that the renewal is not done blindly at the
old interest rates/Zero interest rate)
-
Ensure proper classification of
savings/current deposit with the debit balance as advances
-
Anti Money Laundering Act
-
Check that proper record of all transactions
involving receipts by non- profit organizations of value more than rupees
ten lakh or its equivalent in foreign currency is maintained and to forward
a report to FIU-IND Ref: Government of India Notification dated November 12,
2009- Rule 3, sub-rule (1) clause (BA) of PML Rules
-
In case of walk-in customer, where the amount
of transaction is equal to or exceeds rupees fifty thousand whether
conducted as a single transaction or several transactions that appear to be
connected, check that the customer's identity and address is verified by the
Bank in terms of Clause (b) (ii) of Rule 9 of the PML Rules, 2005
-
To ensure compliance with Master Circular of
instructions relating to deposits held in FCNR(B) Accounts issued by Reserve
Bank of India on July 01, 2009
Ensure that the Deposits from Grameen banks
classified as Deposits from the banks as per the third schedule to the
Banking Regulation Act, 1949
-
Dormant accounts required should be verified
for unusual movement of funds from the account.
-
Last year’s dormant accounts list should be
compared with current year’s list along with amounts to identify old
accounts which were activated during the year for verifying unusual
transactions, if any.
-
Verify if the specimen signature cards of
dormant accounts are kept separately under joint custody of Manager/Officer.
Any cash withdrawal/debits to dormant account should be authorized by the
Branch–in–charge
-
Interest calculations
-
Verify interest on all schemes of deposits on
test check basis e.g. Verify the fields like interest rate with relevant
circulars, period of interest, amount of deposit and accrual of interest in
the account, interest calculation on premature deposit withdrawal, recurring
deposits, back dated renewals
-
Ascertain reasons for frequent reversal of
interest and the authorization for the same
-
RBI Norms for non–resident deposits & its
operations — with due importance to opening and operation of accounts like
NRE, NRNR, FCNR, RFC, etc
-
Examine interest trends as compared to average
annual deposits (monthly average figures)
-
In case of deposits frozen by Revenue/
Regulatory/ Government etc, procedure given in Master Circular on Interest
Rates on Rupee Deposits held in Domestic, Ordinary Non–Resident (NRO) and
Non–Resident (External) (NRE) Accounts should be followed for Interest
credit
-
Verify that interest on term deposit matured
and remaining unpaid will attract saving bank account rate of interest.
-
In case of any advance given after the
interest process run done, than need to ensure that a proper provisioning is
made for the same.
-
Tax Deducted at Source
-
Verify that TDS returns have been uplinked as
per schedule laid down in the Income–tax Act, 1961. Also ensure if the Form
15–G and Form 15–H are filed with the Income-tax department within the
specified time schedule
-
Refer CBDT circular no.3/2010 dated 02.03.2010
on Tax Deduction at Source on interest accrual in Core-Branch Banking
Solutions (CBS) software
-
ADVANCES
-
Preliminary information before audit of
Advances:
-
Obtain the Head Office delegation of power and
duties & limit fixed for Branch and its executives
-
Study the various reports issued by the
concurrent auditors, RBI Inspection reports, RO inspectors. Gain
understanding of various audit points and material discrepancies and
irregularities reported and compliances of the same. Review monitoring
reports (irregularity reports) sent by the branch to the controlling
authorities in respect of irregular advances.
-
Obtain the detailed list of advances to
identify major borrowers, period since when granted, nature of advances and
clients, major defaulters, lending under various schemes, industry wise
lending, probable NPA, highly sensitive accounts, CDR & BIFR cases, Advances
in D1 and D2 (which requires calculation of Asset Shortage), Restructured
accounts, OTS proposals, possibility of window dressing in the account, up
gradation as well as down gradation of accounts. Compare the list with
previous audit to find out major recoveries
-
Verification of Advances:
Before providing any financial assistance, the
branch has to follow the systems and procedures as defined by the HO. As an
auditor, we have to comment on the flaws in the system, if any, and verify
that branch is complying with policies and procedures of the HO before and
after granting a Loan.
Efficacy of internal control on Advances
can be verified with reference to following criteria:
-
Application:
-
Check whether prescribed application form
received from the borrower for fresh on renewal proposal
-
Check KYC compliance as per RBI requirements
-
Verify Board resolution for the availment of
the facility
-
Verify that latest financial
statements/income tax records of borrowers or guarantor are obtained
-
Verify that various
registration/licenses/permits are obtained
-
Credit Appraisal:
-
Review appraisal system, Files of large as
well as critical borrowers, sanctions, disbursement, renewals,
documentation, systems, securities, etc
-
Verify appraisal note of bank is proper and
is done by competent authorities
-
Review projections whether realistic and
evaluate latest financial statements, Prospects of business, sources and
periodicity of repayments, evaluation of financial statements, capacity
utilization
-
Verify networth statement of borrower and
guarantor
-
Review confidential report and NOC from
existing banker and credit worthiness of borrower
-
Review CIBIL Report, Title clearance report
& valuation report
-
Verify whether Exposure limit is within the
limits fixed by Bank-group wise, Industry wise & policy of Bank
-
Verify nature of securities (prime/
collateral) offered and to confirm the adequacy of security cover
-
Verify that important Financial ratios are
satisfactory such as
-
Ensure compliance of branch regarding
prescribed procedures for credit appraisal
-
Ensure whether Branch is conducting credit
rating of major advances accounts on periodic basis
-
Ensure whether Credit Rating in respect of
advance accounts spread over more than one branch is same
-
Sanction and Disbursement:
-
Compliance of sanction terms and conditions
in the case of new advances
-
Verify whether any sanction is beyond the
delegation power and if so, whether reporting and confirmation of the same
to the higher authorities is done/ obtained
-
Verify that proposal has been routed through
appropriate authorisation levels and recommendations are properly
documented and noted
-
Ensure that limits sanctioned are within the
discretionary powers of the sanctioning authority
-
In case where the sanctions are beyond the
discretionary powers, the same has been reported to appropriate
authorities and ratified within specified period
-
Ensure that any change in the terms of
sanction is ratified by appropriate authority
-
Verify that pre disbursement unit inspection
has been carried out & report held on record
-
Adhoc limits (increase) given to borrower
for temporary/ seasonal/ peak periods – whether reported to controlling
authorities and whether liquidated in time
-
Verify whether any advances have been
disbursed without fulfilling the conditions in the sanction
-
Verify that Disbursement done only after
compliance of all terms & conditions of Sanction letter.
-
Verify all Ad hoc sanction limits given
-
Verify that acceptance of the borrower
confirming the terms & conditions of sanction is obtained
-
Verify that sanction letter/limit approval
letter stating the terms and conditions is available
-
Verify Margin Money to be brought by
borrower
-
Verify end use of funds (capex, Project,
etc)
-
Documentation:
-
Verify the advances with reference to the
Documentation requirements as per the HO’s instructions
-
Ensure that all loan documents, as required
by the sanction letter and loan policy have been executed (e.g. DP Note,
loan Agreement, Letter of guarantee, hypothecation Agreement, etc.)
-
Verify that loan documents are properly
executed and approved by legal expert, if required – whether appropriately
stamped
-
Ensure that Fresh loan documents are
obtained on change in limit, change in the constitution of the borrower
-
Review of ROC forms on test check basis to
confirm whether charges have been registered
-
Verify that original agreement, share
certificate, title deeds, title clearance certificate valuation report are
held on record
-
In case of Third–party borrowing against
Branch Fixed Deposits, normal lending rate of interest should be applied
as against concessional rate
-
Ensure that documents should not be blank or
incomplete & there should be no overwriting, changes, different inks etc.
-
Ensure that original documents are kept in
safe custody
-
Verify that charge on securities offered
have been registered with registrar of companies/ appropriate authority (RTO,
Mortgage Registration)
-
Check NOC of housing society
-
Check memorandum and Articles of Association
or proof of constitution of the borrower
-
Ensure compliance with special documentation
for Consortium/ Multiple Banking advances
-
Whether advances against lien of deposits
have been properly granted by marking a lien on the deposit in accordance
with the guidelines of the controlling authorities of the bank
-
Verify whether as per the Master circular
No. DBOD No. BP. BC.46/ 08.12.001/2008–09 dated 19 September, 2008; bank
has obtained declaration and certification by a professional, regarding
compliance of various statutory prescriptions from the borrower enjoying
the Consortium/Multiple Banking Arrangements
-
Insurance policies with bank clause should
be obtained for stocks and collateral, (residence, office premises, etc.)
and for stocks held by third parties on Job–work basis
-
Verify the consortium advances accounts with
regard to:
Status on Joint Documentation, Inspection of unit, Updated minutes of
consortium, confirmation from lead bank that they are holding valid
documents, monthly updation of drawing power based on lead bank’s advice
-
Whether the borrower is regular in
submission of stock statements, book debt statements, insurance policies,
annual accounts, half yearly results, etc. and whether penal interest is
charged in case of default/delay in submission of such data (whether
branch is marking the date of receipt on the statement). Whether the bank
verifies these statements critically and seeks clarification wherever
required e.g. (format is proper, details are adequate, etc). Whether year
end stock statement matches with Audited Accounts Stock figure
-
Obtain the list of accounts where
acknowledgement of debt is not taken from the borrower
-
Supervision/ Monitoring:
-
Verify if any Letter of Credit (L/C) limit
is availed, the stocks under L/C are separately shown in the stock
statements, to prevent double financing
-
Verify that the unit submits separate stock
statements for Packing Credit (PC) facility and the liquidation is out of
export proceeds (if not, concessional interest has to be revised to normal
interest charged to the party). Verify whether exchange translation is
done regularly to check whether overall exposure is within limits in case
of Foreign Currency denominated PC
-
Verify if age–wise analysis of book debts is
submitted
-
If stocks are kept at rented godowns,
No–lien letters should be obtained from the concerned owners/landlord
-
Verify that non–moving stocks are reduced
when calculating the DP
-
Check classification of advances, income
recognition and provisioning as per RBI Norms/Circulars
-
Examine interest trends as compared to
average annual advances (monthly average figures)
-
Scrutinize the final advances statements
with regard to assets classification, security value, documentation,
drawing power, outstanding, provisions, etc. in line with the requirements
of Master Circular – Prudential norms on Income Recognition, Asset
Classification and Provisioning pertaining to Advances cross check whether
the guidelines issued by the Bank for the purpose of classification of
advances are in line or more prudent than the RBI guidelines. Verify
whether the value of security considered is proper/ realistic
-
Check whether Non–Fund based (Letter of
Credits/Bank Guarantees) exposure of the borrowers is within the
sanctioned limits
-
Compare projected financial figures given at
the time of project appraisal with actual figures from audited financial
statements for relevant period and ascertain reasons for large variances,
if any.
-
Take into account the assessment of RBI if
the regional office of RBI has forwarded a list of individual advances to
the bank, where the variance in the provisioning requirements between the
RBI and the bank is above certain cut off levels
-
Verify the derivatives and off–balance sheet
transactions entered into by constituents for any liability and ensure
that Marked to Market Margins of Security is taken and amounts provided
for in case of default by the party.
-
Verify if the accounts are pending for
review/renewal
-
Status of other banks to ensure there is no
excess financing against the stock/book debts
-
Verify whether Non–performing accounts
reported to the Head office promptly
-
Whether Branch is following the Recovery
policy and legal action is taken on the advances whenever required as per
the Policy of the Bank
-
Review the monitoring system; i.e.,
monitoring end use of funds, analytical system prevalent for the advances,
cash flow monitoring, branch follow–up, consortium meetings, inspection
reports, stock audit reports, market intelligence (industry analysis),
securities updation, etc.
-
Incase of advances against shares verify
that branch has not given loan against Banks own shares and any other
partly paid up shares
-
Drawing Power (DP) Calculation
-
Based on Stocks, Debtors and Share value
-
Critical review of stock/ Book Debts
statement (Old debtors more than 180 days not to be considered)
-
DP limits to be set as per latest
statements. If stock statements is older than 3 months account to be
classified as “irregular”
-
Verify banks guidelines for DP calculation
specially for unpaid stocks
-
Verify Inventory & equity shares Valuation
-
Verify annual audit report of the borrower
with the monthly stock statement for the last month of the year
-
Verify Stock audit report for NPA’s more
than Rs5 Crore
-
Fraud in Advances
-
Sanction without proper application and/or
credit appraisal
-
Sanction made beyond discretionary power and
non-reporting of the same to the appropriate authority
-
Unauthorised release of securities
-
Security valuation (Especially NPA account
e.g. Immovable Assets, Patents)
-
Charging of same security to different Banks
-
Diversion of funds
-
Fraud risk relating to Controls
-
Submission of fake transport documents/
godown receipts
-
Discounting of accommodation bills/
issuance/ LC
-
Restructured Advances
Verify whether branch has complied with Master
Circular No. DBOD.No.BP.BC. 21 /21.04.048/2010-11 dated July 1, 2010 on
Restructuring of advances.
Consider the following important points
covered in Circular:
-
Restructured account could be under
'Standard', 'Sub–standard' and 'Doubtful' categories. Banks cannot
reschedule/ restructure/ re–negotiate borrower accounts with retrospective
effect
-
Date of approval of the restructured package
by the competent authority would be relevant to decide the asset
classification status of the account after restructuring/ rescheduling/
renegotiation
-
Prior approval should be obtained in case of
BIFR and CDR cases under restructuring
-
An existing 'Standard asset' will not be
downgraded to Sub–standard category upon restructuring and if during the
specified period, the asset classification of Sub–standard/ Doubtful
accounts will not deteriorate upon restructuring, if satisfactory
performance is demonstrated during the specified period
-
Asset Classification will not be downgraded
if satisfactory performance observed during the specified period, subject
to:
-
dues being fully secured
-
unit becomes viable in 7 years (10 years
for infrastructure cases)
-
loan is repayable in 10 years (15 years
for Infrastructure cases)
-
promoter sacrifice and additional funding
of at least 15 % of Bank Sacrifice
-
obtaining personal Guarantee of promoters
(Specified period means period of one year
from the date when the 1st payment of interest or installment of principal
falls due under the terms of restructuring)
-
Verify the Financial viability and
reasonable certainty of repayment of each account restructured
-
Verify that advance covered under
restructuring should be from other than capital market exposure, personal/
consumer loan
-
Verify whether borrowers indulging in frauds
and malfeasance are not taken for restructuring. As per circular they
remain ineligible for restructuring
-
Intangible Securities like rights,
licenses, authorization etc. charged to the bank as collateral security
should not be reckoned as tangible security and to be recorded as
unsecured.
-
Banks should also disclose the total
amount of advances for which intangible securities such as charge over
the rights, licenses, authority, etc. has been taken as also the
estimated value of such intangible collateral. The disclosure may be
made under a separate head in “Notes to Accounts”. This would
differentiate such loans from other entirely unsecured loans.
-
In terms of paragraph 2(a) of circular
DBOD.No.BP.BC.125/21.04.048/2008-09
dated April 17, 2009 on ‘Prudential Norms on Unsecured Advances’,
rights, licenses, authorizations, etc. charged to banks as collateral in
respect of projects (including infrastructure projects) should not be
reckoned as tangible security. In partial modification to the above it
has been decided that banks may treat annuities under
build-operate-transfer (BOT) model in respect of road/highway projects
and toll collection rights, where there are provisions to compensate the
project sponsor if a certain level of traffic is not achieved, as
tangible securities subject to the condition that banks’ right to
receive annuities and toll collection rights is legally enforceable and
irrevocable.
-
Provisioning Norms:
-
Normal Provision: Bank will hold provision
against restructured advances as per the existing provisioning norms.
Provision should be difference between the fair value of loan before and
after restructuring
Fair value before restructuring: Present
value of cash flows (Principal and interest at the existing rate charged
on the advance before restructuring) discounted at bank’s BPLR plus
appropriate term premium and credit risk premium for the borrower category
on the date of restructuring"
Fair value of the loan after restructuring:
Present value of cash flows (Principal and interest at the rate charged on
the advance on restructuring) discounted at a rate equal to bank’s BPLR
plus appropriate term premium and credit risk premium for the borrower
category on the date of restructuring"
WCTL fair value should be computed as per
actual cash flow
In case any security is taken in lieu of the diminution in the fair value
of the advance, it should be valued at Re.1 till maturity of the security
-
Option in notionally computation of
Diminution in fair value: Due to lack of expertise/ appropriate
infrastructure RBI has given option to provide diminution at five percent
of the total exposure, in respect of all restructured accounts where the
total dues to bank(s) are less than rupees one crore till the financial
year ending March 2011. The position would be reviewed thereafter
Diminution in the fair value may be
re–computed on each balance sheet date till satisfactory completion of all
repayment obligations and full repayment of the outstanding in the
account. Bank may provide short fall in provision or may reverse the
provision held in distinct account
-
Incase of standard asset: May be treated
as ‘standard asset’, up to a period of one year after the first
interest/ principal payment
-
In case where pre–restructuring facilities
were classified as ‘sub–standard’ and ‘doubtful: On cash basis only
-
Master circular on Agricultural Debt Waiver
and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008 – Prudential Norms on Income Recognition,
Asset Classification, Provisioning, and Capital Adequacy should be
followed in case of agricultural advances as per debt waiver scheme
-
As per RBI Circular No.DBOD.No.BP.BC. 46
/21.04.048/2009-10 dated September 24, 2009
-
On an account turning NPA, banks should
reverse the interest already charged and not collected by debiting Profit
and Loss account, and stop further application of interest. However, banks
may continue to record such accrued interest in a Memorandum account in
their books, as is the practice currently followed by some banks.
-
For the purpose of computing Gross Advances,
interest recorded in the Memorandum account should not be taken into
account.
-
Review of Operations
-
Verify accounts with multiple banking
facility, with regard to Drawing Power
-
Charge of interest and recovery for each
month/quarter or as applicable to be verified
-
Review operations in the large Advance
Accounts and selectively in other accounts
-
Verify debit/credit summation in account with
the unit’s turnover in audited accounts
-
Verify whether bank is charging penal interest
wherever applicable
-
Obtain the list of Temporary overdrafts and
verify authorization and interest application on the same
-
Incases of advances given against Deposits,
whether lien is marked on the Deposits
-
Transaction in the post balance sheet date
period
-
Change in Interest rate retrospectively in
master file of borrower should be blocked at branch level
-
PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT
Income/Expenditure: Verify
-
Short debit of interest/commission on
advances; Excess credit of interest on deposits; In case the discrepancies
are existing in large number of cases, the auditor should consider the
impact of the same on the accounts; check if charges are recovered from
customers on outward RTGS transactions; Determine whether the discrepancies
noticed are intentional or by error; Go through the
Concurrent/Internal/Revenue Audit report to assess whether the Branch has
properly applied interest to deposit/advances accounts, revenue leakage
detected, comments on internal control. If discrepancies are pointed out,
the Statutory Auditor may ensure whether the same have been rectified. Check
whether the recurrence of such discrepancies are general or in respect of
some specific clients
-
Proper authority in sanction and disbursement
of expenses as also the correctness of the accounting treatment given as to
revenue/ capital/ deferred expenses; Check accrual of income/expenditure
especially for the last month/ quarter of the financial year
-
Verify the significant systematic reversal of
income and expenditure with proper reasons.
-
Verify the computation of Guarantee Commission
and its application over the period of the Guarantee
-
Check whether the ASBA commission is accounted
properly.
Divergent Trends
-
Income/ expenditure of the current year should
be compared with the figures of the previous year. Wherever a divergent
trend is observed, obtain an explanation along with supporting evidences
like monthly average figures, composition of the income/ expenditure, etc
-
Verify major items of Expenses especially Rent
with respect to the Agreement for Rent of the Branch Premises with the
Landlord
-
BALANCE SHEET
Cash & Bank Balances
-
Physically verify the Cash Balance as on the
year/ period end or trace back the cash balance from the date of
verification to year/ period end
-
Check instances of cash exceeding the
retention limit as set by the Controlling Authorities. Frequent excesses
should be reported in the Long Form Audit Report (LFAR)
-
Verify cash held at ATM and tally with General
ledger
-
If substantial amount of soiled notes is held,
it should be reported
-
Check Insurance cover held for cash balances
with the advice sent by HO
-
Confirm and verify the reconciliation
statements of the Balances with banks as on year end
-
Check whether the surprise verification of
cash by the independent officer or the branch manager is carried out and
frequency of the same
Investments
-
Physically verify the Investments held by the
branch on behalf of Head Office and issue certificate of physical
verification of investments to bank’s Investments Department/ Central
Statutory Auditors
-
Check receipt of interest and its subsequent
credit given to Head Office
Fixed Assets
-
Check whether the Fixed Asset Register
maintained contain details such as location of asset, tag no. given to
asset, person using the asset, units of asset, date of capitalization, date
of disposal/ write off and whether Fixed Assets Verification have been
carried out periodically as per the policy.
-
Check Inter–branch transfer memos relating to
Fixed Assets and whether they have been correctly classified in the accounts
and depreciation accounting thereof
-
Check if Dead Stock Register is duly updated
and signed by the concerned Manager
-
Ascertain the Branch manager’s power to
acquire new fixed assets and frequency of physical verification
-
Verify the suspense account to identify any
amount paid to vendor but still unadjusted.
Inter–Branch Reconciliation (IBR)
-
Understand the IBR system in detail and
prepare an audit plan to review the IBR transactions. The large volume of
Inter–Branch Transactions and the large number of unreconciled entries in
the banking system makes the area fraud–prone
-
Check the head office inward communication to
branch to ascertain date up to which statements relating to inter–branch
reconciliation have been sent
-
Verify the Reversal of any large/ old/
unexplained entries, which had remained outstanding in IBR
-
Items of revenue nature, cash–in–transit (for
example, cash meant for deposit into currency chest) which remains pending
for more than a reasonable period
-
Double responses to the entries in the
Accounts
-
Selectively verify accuracy and correctness of
“Daily statements” which are prepared by the branch and sent to IBR
department
-
The auditor should duly consider the extent of
non–reconciliation in forming his opinion on the financial statements. Where
the amounts involved are material, the auditor should suitably qualify his
audit report. Attention is drawn on the paper on “Certain Significant Aspect
of Statutory Audit of Banks” issued by the Council of ICAI in March, 1994,
published in the CA journal
-
Further, vide its circular No.
RPCD.CO.RF.BC.No.103/07.37.02/2004-05 dated may 30, 2005, the Reserve Bank
(RBI) advised the banks to maintain category–wise (head–wise) accounts for
various types of transactions put through inter–branch accounts so that the
netting can be done category–wise. Further, RBI advised banks to make 100
per cent provision (category–wise) for net debit position in their
inter–branch accounts arising out of the unreconciled entries, both debit
and credit, outstanding for more than six months
-
Verify the Inter Office Accounting system
under Core Banking Solution (CBS) Branches & verify items not accounted
properly & lying in some specific accounts.
Suspense Accounts, Sundry Deposits, etc
-
Suspense and Sundry Deposit accounts are
adjustment accounts in which certain debit transactions whose authorisation
is pending for approval or whose accounting head is not known are
temporarily posted
-
As and when the transactions are duly
authorised by the concerned officials they are posted to the respective
accounts and the Suspense Account/ Sundry Deposit account is credited/
debited respectively
-
Ask for and analyse their year–wise break–up
-
Check the nature and details of entries parked
in such Accounts
-
Check any movement in such old balances and
whether the same is genuine and has been properly authorised by the
competent authority
-
Check for any revenue items lying in such
accounts and whether proper treatment has been given for the same
-
Auditors Report & Memorandum of Changes
-
The Auditors Report should be a self contained
document and should contain no reference of any point made in any other
report including the LFAR
-
Include Audit Qualifications in the Auditors
Report and not in the LFAR
-
Quantify the Audit Qualifications for a better
appreciation of the point
-
For suggesting any changes in the financial
statements of the branch, quantify the same in the Memorandum of Changes (MOC)
and make it a subject matter of qualification and annexed it to the
Auditors’ Report
Contingent Liabilities
-
Contingent liabilities, being an important
“off balance sheet” item, seek reasonable assurance that all contingent
liabilities are identified and properly disclosed. E.g. Increase in rent of
premises by landlord disputed by bank
-
Obtain a letter of representation
-
LONG FORM AUDIT REPORT (LFAR)
-
Study the LFAR Questionnaire thoroughly
-
Plan the LFAR work along with the statutory
audit right from day one
-
The LFAR questionnaire is a useful tool for
planning the statutory audit of a branch
-
Complete and submit Audit Report as well as
the LFAR simultaneously
-
Be specific while replying the LFAR
-
Give instances of shortcomings/weaknesses
existing in the respective areas of the branch functioning in the LFAR
-
The LFAR should be sufficiently detailed and
quantified so that they can be expeditiously consolidated by the bank
-
FRAUD REPORTING
-
Obtain the latest status of cases involving
fraud, vigilance and matters under investigation having effect on the
accounts and its reporting requirement. Review the Master circular DBS. FrMC.
BC. No.1/23.04.001/2010-11 dated July 1, 2010 on FRAUDS – CLASSIFICATION AND
REPORTING issued by RBI (latest as on date of this note dated July 1, 2010)
-
Introduction
Check the frauds involving Rs.1.00 crore and
above reported to Special Committee of the Board.
-
Reporting of frauds to Reserve Bank of
India
Frauds involving Rs.1 lakh and above
-
Fraud reports should be submitted in all
cases of fraud of Rs.1 lakh and above perpetrated through
misrepresentation, breach of trust, manipulation of books of account,
fraudulent encashment of instruments like cheques, drafts and bills of
exchange, unauthorised handling of securities charged to the bank,
misfeasance, embezzlement, misappropriation of funds, conversion of
property, cheating, shortages, irregularities, etc.
-
Fraud reports should also be submitted in
cases where central investigating agencies have initiated criminal
proceedings suo motto and/or where the Reserve Bank has directed that they
be reported as frauds.
-
Soft copy of the reports on frauds in FMR
formats should be submitted to the Central Office of the Department of
Banking Supervision (DBS). Within three weeks of detection of fraud
involving Rs.5.00 lakh and above the copy of FMR-1 should be submitted to
the Central Office, DBS and the Regional Office (RO) DBS under whose
jurisdiction the Head office of the bank falls and the RO of DBS under
whose jurisdiction the branch where the fraud occurs falls. Fraud reports
in hard copy format (FMR-1) involving frauds of Rs.1.00 lakh and above and
less than Rs.5.00 lakh should be sent only to the concerned Regional
Office of RBI, DBS.
-
Frauds Committed by unscrupulous borrowers
Banks should exercise due diligence while
appraising the credit needs of unscrupulous borrowers, borrower companies,
partnership/ proprietorship concerns and their directors, partners and
proprietors, etc. as also their associates who have defrauded the banks.
In addition to above borrower- fraudsters,
third parties such as builders, warehouse/cold storage owners, motor
vehicle/tractor dealers, travel agents, etc and professionals such as
architects, valuers, chartered accountants, advocates, etc. are also to be
held accountable if they have played a vital role in credit
sanction/disbursement or facilitated the perpetration frauds. Banks are
advised report to Indian Banks Association (IBA) the details of such third
parties involved in frauds.
Before reporting to IBA, banks have to satisfy
themselves of the involvement of third parties concerned and also provide
themwith an opportunity of being heard. In this regard the banks should
follow formal procedures and the processes followed should be suitably
recorded. On the basis of such information, IBA would, in turn, prepare
caution lists of such third parties for circulation among the banks.
Frauds in borrowal accounts having multiple
banking arrangements
Certain unscrupulous borrowers enjoying credit
facilities under "multiple banking arrangement” after defrauding one of the
financing banks, continue to enjoy the facilities with other financing banks
and in some cases avail even higher limits at those banks. In certain cases
the borrowers use the accounts maintained at other financing banks to siphon
off funds by diverting from the bank on which the fraud is being
perpetrated. This is due to lack of a formal arrangement for exchange of
information among various lending banks/FIs. In some of the fraud cases, the
securities offered by the borrowers to different banks are the same.
In view of this, all the banks which have
financed a borrower under 'multiple banking' arrangement should take co-ordinated
action, based on commonly agreed strategy, for legal / criminal actions,
follow up for recovery, exchange of details on modus operandi, achieving
consistency in data / information on frauds reported to Reserve Bank of
India. Therefore, bank which detects a fraud is required to immediately
share the details with all other banks in the multiple banking arrangements.
-
Frauds involving Rs.100.00 lakh and above
In respect of frauds involving Rs.100 lakh and
above, banks may report the fraud by means of a D.O. letter addressed to the
Chief General Manager in charge of the Department of Banking Supervision,
RBI, Central Office, within a week of such frauds coming to the notice of
the bank’s Head Office. The letter may contain brief particulars of the
fraud such as amount involved, nature of fraud, modus operandi in brief,
name of the branch/office, names of parties involved (if they are
proprietorship/ partnership concerns or private limited companies, the names
of proprietors, partners and directors), names of officials involved, and
whether the complaint has been lodged with the Police/CBI. A copy of the D.O.
letter should also be endorsed to the Regional Office of RBI under whose
jurisdiction the bank's branch, where the fraud has been perpetrated, is
functioning.
Closure of fraud cases
Banks will report to the Frauds Monitoring
Cell, RBI, Department of Banking Supervision (DBS), Central Office, Mumbai
and the respective Regional offices of the DBS, the details of fraud cases
closed along with reasons for the closure where no further action was called
for.
Fraud cases closed during the quarter are
required to be reported in quarterly return FMR 3 and cross checked with
relevant column in FMR-2 return before sending to RBI.
Banks should report only such cases as closed
where the actions as stated below are complete and prior approval is
obtained from the respective Regional Offices of DBS
-
The fraud cases pending with
CBI/Police/Court are finally disposed of.
-
The examination of staff accountability has
been completed
-
The amount of fraud has been recovered or
written off.
-
Insurance claim wherever applicable has been
settled.
-
The bank has reviewed the systems and
procedures, identified the causative factors and plugged the lacunae and
the fact of which has been certified by the appropriate authority (Board /
Audit Committee of the Board)
-
Banks should also pursue vigorously with CBI
for final disposal of pending fraud cases especially where the banks
have completed staff side action. Similarly, banks may vigorously follow
up with the police authorities and/or court for final disposal of fraud
cases and / or court for final disposal of fraud cases.
Banks are allowed, for limited statistical /
reporting purposes, to close those fraud cases involving amounts upto
Rs.25.00 lakh, where:
The investigation is on or challan/ charge
sheet not filed in the Court for more than three years from the date of
filing of First Information Report (FIR) by the CBI/Police., or the trial in
the courts, after filing of charge sheet / challan by CBI / Police, has not
started, or is in progress.
-
Quarterly Review of Fraud
Banks are required to constitute a Special
Committee for monitoring and follow up of cases of frauds involving amounts
of Rs.1.00 crore and above exclusively, while Audit Committee of the Board (ACB)
may continue to monitor all the cases of frauds in general. The Special
Committee should consist of CMD in case of public sector banks and MD in
case of SBI/its Associates. In case of private sector banks, two members
from ACB, two members from Board excluding RBI nominee.
The major functions of the Special Committee
would be to monitor and review all the frauds of Rs.1.00 crore and above so
as to:
-
Identify the systemic lacunae if any that
facilitated perpetration of the fraud and put in place majors to plug the
same:
-
Identify the reasons for delay in detection,
if any, reporting to top management of the bank and RBI:
-
Monitor progress of CBI/Police investigation
and recovery position:
-
Ensure that staff accountability is examined
at all levels in all the cases of frauds and staff side action, if
required, is completed quickly without loss of time:
-
Review the efficacy of the remedial action
taken to prevent recurrence of frauds, such as strengthening of internal
controls:
-
Put on place other measures as may be
considered relevant to strengthen preventive measures against frauds.
All the frauds involving an amount of Rs.1.00
crore and above should be monitored and reviewed by the Special Committee of
the Board in case of all Indian commercial banks. The periodicity of the
meetings of the Special Committee may be decided according to the number of
cases involved. In addition, the Committee should meet and review as and
when a fraud involving an amount of Rs.1.00 crore and above comes to light.
The banks may delineate in a policy document
the processes for implementation of the Committee's directions and the
document may enable a dedicated outfit of the bank to implement the
directions in this regard.
-
Guideline for Reporting Frauds To
Police/CBI
Private sector banks (including foreign banks
operating in India) should follow the following guidelines for reporting of
frauds such as unauthorised credit facilities extended by the bank for
illegal gratification, negligence and cash shortages, cheating, forgery,
etc. to the State Police authorities:
-
In dealing with cases of fraud/embezzlement,
banks should not merely be actuated by the necessity of recovering
expeditiously the amount involved, but should also be motivated by public
interest and the need for ensuring that the guilty persons do not go
unpunished.
-
Therefore, as a general rule, the following
cases should invariably be referred to the State Police:
-
Cases of fraud involving an amount of
Rs.1.00 lakh and above, committed by outsiders on their own and/or with
the connivance of bank staff/officers.
-
Cases of fraud committed by bank
employees, when it involves bank funds exceeding Rs.10,000/-.
-
Fraud cases involving amounts of Rs.1.00
crore and above should also be reported to the Director, Serious Fraud
Investigation Office (SFIO), Ministry of Company Affairs, Government of
India. Second Floor, Paryavaran Bhavan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi
110 003. Details of the fraud are to be reported to SFIO in FMR-1 Format.
Public sector banks should report fraud cases
involving amount of Rs.1 crore and above to CBI and those below Rs.1 crore
to local police, as detailed below:
Cases to be referred to CBI
(a) Cases of Rs.1.00 crore and above upto
Rs.5.00 crore
(b) All cases involving more than Rs.5.00
crore – Banking Security and Fraud Cell of the respective centres, which is
specialised cell of the Economic Offences Wing of the CBI for major bank
fraud cases.
Cases to be referred to Local Police
Cases below Rs.1 crore – Local Police.
-
Cases of financial frauds of the value of
Rs.1.00 lakh and above, which involve outsiders (private parties) and bank
staff, should be reported by the Regional Head of the bank concerned to a
senior officer of the State CID/Economic Offences Wing of the State
concerned.
-
For cases of financial frauds below the
value of Rs.1.00 lakh but above Rs.10,000/- the cases should be reported
to the local police station by the bank branch concerned.
-
All fraud cases of value below Rs.10,000
involving bank officials, should be referred to the Regional Head of the
bank, who would scrutinize each case and direct the bank branch concerned
on whether it should be reported to the local police station for further
legal action.
-
GENERAL
-
Send a Letter of your requirements of
records/accounts/document to the Branch before commencing the audit
-
Obtain a Management Representation Letter (MRL)
-
Banks are advised to strictly comply with the
extant regulations and in particular of Master circular on Issuance of
Guarantee, not to provide guarantees or equivalent commitments for issuance
of bonds or debt instruments of any kind. (Master circular on Issuance of
Guarantee DBOD. No. Dir. BC.18/ 13.03.00/ 2008–09 dated July 1, 2009)
-
To ensure compliance with RBI Circular
DBOD.BP.BC.No. 42 /08.12.015/ 2009-10 dated September 9, 2009 with respect
to Classification of Exposures as Commercial Real Estate (CRE) Exposures
-
As per RBI Circular RPCD.SME & NFS. BC.No. 79
/06.02.31/2009-10 dated May 6, 2010 , guidelines for collateral free loans
upto Rs.10 lakh sanctioned to the units of MSE sector (both manufacturing and
service enterprises) as defined under MSMED Act, 2006 is mandatory and banks
must not obtain collateral security in the case of loans upto Rs10 lakh
extended to all units of the MSE sector.
INCOME RECOGNITION & ASSET CLASSIFICATION NORMS
– AT A GLANCE
CLASSIFICATION OF ADVANCES AS NPA
Term Loans
-
Interest or installment remains overdue for a
period of more than 90 days from end of the quarter
-
Agricultural Advances: Agricultural loans
granted for short duration crops and long duration crops will be treated as
NPA, if the installment of principal or interest thereon remains overdue for
two crop seasons and one crop season respectively
-
Overdue: An amount due to the bank under any
credit facility is ‘Overdue’ if it is not paid on the due date fixed by the
bank
Cash Credits & Overdrafts
-
The account remains continuously “out of order”
i.e., Outstanding balance remains continuously in excess of the sanctioned
limit/ drawing power or there are no credits continuously for a period of 90
days or credits are not enough to cover the interest debited during the same
period
-
Banks may not classify an account NPA merely due
to existence of some deficiencies, which are of temporary nature such as
non–availability of adequate drawing power temporarily, balance outstanding
exceeding the limit temporarily, non–submission of stock statements and
non–renewal of the limits on the due date but submitted later on, etc
-
A working capital borrowal account will become
NPA if such irregular drawings are permitted in the account for a
continuous period of 90 days even though the unit may be working or the
borrower's financial position is satisfactory.
-
an account where the regular/ ad hoc credit
limits have not been reviewed/ renewed within 180 days from the due date/
date of ad hoc sanction will be treated as NPA
-
Balance outstanding in the account based on
drawing power calculated from stock statements more than 3 months old would be
deemed as irregular
-
Further, an account where the regular/ ad hoc
credit limits have not been reviewed/ renewed within 180 days from the due
date/ date of ad hoc sanction respectively, will be treated as NPA
Bills Purchased & Discounted
Other Accounts
-
Any amount to be received in respect of that
facility remains overdue for a period of more than 90 days Government
guaranteed advances
-
State Government guaranteed advances in respect
of which guarantee has been invoked and has remained in default for more than
90 days
-
The credit facilities backed by guarantee of
Central Government though overdue may be treated as NPA only when the
Government repudiates its guarantee when invoked. However, income shall not be
recognised if the interest or instalment has remained overdue or the account
has remained continuously out of order or the bills or any other facility has
remained overdue for a period of more than 90 days
Notes:
-
Master Circular
on Prudential Norms on Income recognition, Asset Classification and
Provisioning pertaining to Advance (latest as on date of this note — Circular
No. DBOD.No.BP.BC. 21 /21.04.048/2010-11 dated July 1, 2010 referred to as
Master Circular in this note
Updated:
-
Interest Application
On an account turning NPA, banks should
reverse the interest already charged and not collected by debiting Profit
and Loss account, and stop further application of interest. However, banks
may continue to record such accrued interest in a Memorandum account in
their books. For the purpose of computing Gross Advances, interest recorded
in the Memorandum account should not be taken into account.
-
Computation of NPA levels
Banks are advised to compute their Gross
Advances, Net Advances, Gross NPAs and Net NPAs, as per the format
prescribed in master circular.
For all projects financed by the FIs/ banks after
28th May, 2002, the date of
completion of the project should be clearly spelt out at the time of
financial closure of the project.
There are occasions when the completion of
projects is delayed for legal and other extraneous reasons like delays in
Government approvals etc. All these factors, which are beyond the control of
the promoters, may lead to delay in project implementation and involve
restructuring / reschedulement of loans by banks. Accordingly, the following
asset classification norms would apply to the project loans before
commencement of commercial operations. These guidelines will, however, not
be applicable to restructuring of advances covered under the paragraph 14.1
of this Master Circular (Advances classified as Commercial Real Estate
exposures; Advances classified as Capital Market exposure; and Consumer and
Personal Advances) which will continue to be dealt with in terms of the
extant provisions i.e paragraph 14.1 of the circular.
For this purpose, all project loans have been
divided into the following two categories:
(a) Project Loans for infrastructure sector
(b) Project Loans for non-infrastructure
sector
'Project Loan' would mean any term loan which
has been extended for the purpose of setting up of an economic venture.
Banks must fix a Date of Commencement of Commercial Operations (DCCO) for
all project loans at the time of sanction of the loan / financial closure
(in the case of multiple banking or consortium arrangements).
(i) A loan for an infrastructure project will
be classified as NPA during any time before commencement of commercial
operations as per record of recovery (90 days overdue), unless it is
restructured and becomes eligible for classification as 'standard asset' in
terms of paras (iii) to (v) below.
(ii) A loan for an infrastructure project will
be classified as NPA if it fails to commence commercial operations within
two years from the original DCCO, even if it is regular as per record of
recovery, unless it is restructured and becomes eligible for classification
as 'standard asset' in terms of paras (iii) to (v) below.
(iii) If a project loan classified as 'standard asset' is restructured any
time during the period up to two years from the original date of
commencement of commercial operations (DCCO), in accordance with the
provisions of Part B of this Master Circular, it can be retained as a
standard asset if the fresh DCCO is fixed within the following limits, and
further provided the account continues to be serviced as per the
restructured terms.
(a) Infrastructure Projects involving court
cases
Up to another 2 years (beyond the existing
extended period of 2 years i.e total extension of 4 years), in case the
reason for extension of date of commencement of production is arbitration
proceedings or a court case.
(b) Infrastructure Projects delayed for
other reasons beyond the control of promoters
Up to another 1 year (beyond the existing
extended period of 2 years i.e. total extension of 3 years), in other than
court cases.
(iv) It is re-iterated that the dispensation
subject to adherence to the provisions regarding restructuring of accounts
as contained in the Master Circular which would inter alia require that the
application for restructuring should be received before the expiry of period
of two years from the original DCCO and when the account is still standard
as per record of recovery. The other conditions applicable would be :
a. In cases where there is moratorium for
payment of interest, banks should not book income on accrual basis beyond
two years from the original DCCO, considering the high risk involved in such
restructured accounts.
b. Banks should maintain provisions on such
accounts as long as these are classified as standard assets as under :
-
|
Until two years from the original DCCO
|
0.40% |
|
During the third and the fourth years
after the original DCCO. |
1.00% |
(v) For the purpose of these guidelines, mere
extension of DCCO will also be treated as restructuring even if all other
terms and conditions remain the same.
(i) A loan for a non-infrastructure project
will be classified as NPA during any time before commencement of commercial
operations as per record of recovery (90 days overdue), unless it is
restructured and becomes eligible for classification as 'standard asset' in
terms of paras (iii) to (v) below.
(ii) A loan for a non-infrastructure project
will be classified as NPA if it fails to commence commercial operations
within six months from the original DCCO, even if is regular as per record
of recovery, unless it is restructured and becomes eligible for
classification as 'standard asset' in terms of paras (iii) to (v) below.
(iii) In case of non-infrastructure projects,
if the delay in commencement of commercial operations extends beyond the
period of six months from the date of completion as determined at the time
of financial closure, banks can prescribe a fresh DCCO, and retain the
"standard" classification by undertaking restructuring of accounts in
accordance with the provisions contained in this Master Circular, provided
the fresh DCCO does not extend beyond a period of twelve months from the
original DCCO. This would among others also imply that the restructuring
application is received before the expiry of six months from the original
DCCO, and when the account is still "standard" as per the record of
recovery.
The other conditions applicable would be :
a. In cases where there is moratorium for
payment of interest, banks should not book income on accrual basis beyond
six months from the original DCCO, considering the high risk involved in
such restructured accounts.
b. Banks should maintain provisions on such
accounts as long as these are classified as standard assets as under :
-
|
Until the first six months from the
original DCCO |
0.40% |
|
During the next six months |
1.00% |
(iv) For this purpose, mere extension of DCCO
will also be treated as restructuring even if all other terms and conditions
remain the same.
(i) All other aspects of restructuring of
project loans before commencement of commercial operations would be governed
by the provisions of Part B of Master Circular on Prudential norms on Income
Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning Pertaining to Advances.
Restructuring of project loans after commencement of commercial operations
will also be governed by these instructions.
(ii) Any change in the repayment schedule of a project loan caused due to an
increase in the project outlay on account of increase in scope and size of
the project, would not be treated as restructuring if :
(a) The increase in scope and size of the
project takes place before commencement of commercial operations of the
existing project.
(b) The rise in cost excluding any
cost-overrun in respect of the original project is 25% or more of the
original outlay.
(c) The bank re-assesses the viability of the
project before approving the enhancement of scope and fixing a fresh DCCP.
(d) On re-rating, (if already rated) the new
rating is not below the previous rating by more than one notch.
(iii)These guidelines would apply to those
cases where the modification to terms of existing loans, as indicated above,
are approved by banks from the date of this circular.
(i) The
‘unsecured exposures’ which are identified as ‘substandard’ would attract
additional provision of 10 per cent, i.e., a total of 20 per cent on the
outstanding balance. However, in view of certain safeguards such as escrow
accounts available in respect of infrastructure lending, infrastructure loan
accounts which are classified as sub-standard will attract a provisioning of
15 per cent instead of the aforesaid prescription of 20 per cent. To avail
of this benefit of lower provisioning, the banks should have in place an
appropriate mechanism to escrow the cash flows and also have a clear and
legal first claim on these cash flows. The provisioning requirement for
unsecured ‘doubtful’ assets is 100 per cent. Unsecured exposure is defined
as an exposure where the realisable value of the security, as assessed
by the bank/approved valuers/Reserve Bank’s inspecting officers, is not more
than 10 percent, ab-initio,
of the outstanding exposure. ‘Exposure’ shall include all funded and
non-funded exposures (including underwriting and similar commitments).
‘Security’ will mean tangible security properly discharged to the bank and
will not include intangible securities like guarantees (including State
government guarantees), comfort letters etc
However, banks may treat annuities under
build-operate-transfer (BOT) model in respect of road / highway projects and
toll collection rights, where there are provisions to compensate the project
sponsor if a certain level of traffic is not achieved, as tangible
securities subject to the condition that banks' right to receive annuities
and toll collection rights is legally enforceable and irrevocable.
(i) The provisioning requirements for all
types of standard assets stands amended as below, with effect from November
5, 2009. Banks should make general provision for standard assets at the
following rates for the funded outstanding on global loan portfolio basis:
(a) advances to Commercial Real Estate (CRE)
Sector at 1.00 per cent;
(b) all other loans and advances not included
in (a) and (b) above at 0.40 per cent
Excess Provisions on sale of Standard Asset
/ NPAs
Excess provisions which arise on sale of NPAs
can be admitted as Tier II capital subject to the overall ceiling of 1.25%
of total Risk Weighted Assets. Accordingly, these excess provisions that
arise on sale of NPAs would be eligible for Tier II status in terms of
paragraph 4.3.2 of Master Circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.73/21.06.001/2009-10 dated
February 8, 2010 on Prudential guidelines on Capital Adequacy and Market
Discipline - New Capital Adequacy Framework (NCAF) and paragraph 2.1.1.2.C
of Master Circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.6/21.01.002/2009-10 dated July 1, 2009 on
Prudential Norms on Capital adequacy - Basel I Framework.
i. At present, the provisioning requirements
for NPAs range between 10 per cent and 100 per cent of the outstanding
amount, depending on the age of the NPAs and the security available. Banks
can also make additional specific provisions subject to a consistent policy
based on riskiness of their credit portfolios, because the rates of
provisioning stipulated for NPAs are the regulatory minimum. It has been
observed that there is a wide heterogeneity and variance in the level of
provisioning coverage ratio across different banks.
ii. Currently there is a realisation from a
macro-prudential perspective that banks should build up provisioning and
capital buffers in good times i.e. when the profits are good, which can be
used for absorbing losses in a downturn. With this in view, there is a need
for improving the provisioning cover as the banking system is currently
making good profits. This will enhance the soundness of individual banks, as
also the stability of the financial sector. It has therefore been decided
that banks should augment their provisioning cushions consisting of specific
provisions against NPAs as well as floating provisions, and ensure that
their total provisioning coverage ratio, including floating provisions, is
not less than 70 per cent.
iii. Provisioning Coverage Ratio (PCR) is
essentially the ratio of provisioning to gross non-performing assets and
indicates the extent of funds a bank has kept aside to cover loan losses.
iv. Banks should achieve this norm not later
than end-September 2010. Also, the PCR should be disclosed in the Notes to
Accounts to the Balance Sheet.
Banks should also disclose in their published
annual Balance Sheets, under "Notes on Accounts", information relating to
number and amount of advances restructured, and the amount of diminution in
the fair value of the restructured advances. The information would be
required for advances restructured under CDR Mechanism, SME Debt
Restructuring Mechanism and other categories separately. Banks must disclose
the total amount outstanding in all the accounts / facilities of borrowers
whose accounts have been restructured along with the restructured part or
facility. This means even if only one of the facilities / accounts of a
borrower has been restructured, the bank should also disclose the entire
outstanding amount pertaining to all the facilities / accounts of that
particular borrower.
In view of the recent drought in some States
and the severe floods in some other parts of the country, the Government of
India, as announced in the Union Budget 2010-11, has now decided to extend
the last date of payment of 75% of overdue portion by the 'other farmer'
under Debt Relief Scheme (under ADWDR) up to June 30, 2010. The eligible
"other farmers" may be allowed to repay this amount in one or more
installments up to June 30, 2010. The banks will not charge any interest on
the eligible amount for the period from February 29, 2008 to June 30, 2009.
However, they may charge normal rate of interest on the eligible amount from
July 01, 2009 up to the date of settlement. Further, no interest shall be
paid by the Government of India to the lending institutions for this
extension under the Scheme while reimbursing the 25% amount to the lending
institutions as per the delayed reimbursement schedule
The Government of India has also advised that
the banks / lending institutions are allowed to receive even less than 75%
of the eligible amount under OTS provided the banks / lending institutions
bear the difference themselves and do not claim the same either from the
Government or from the farmer. The Government will pay only 25% of the
actual eligible amount under debt relief.
-
In case, however, the payments are delayed
by the farmers beyond June 30, 2010, the outstanding amount in the
relevant accounts of such farmers shall be treated as NPA. The asset
classification of such accounts shall be determined with reference to the
original date of NPA, (as if the account had not been treated as
performing in the interregnum based on the aforesaid undertaking). On such
down-gradation of the accounts, additional provisions as per the extant
prudential norms should also be made.
-
Please refer to the paragraph 20.1.1 which
provides that in case of small and marginal farmers eligible for debt
waiver, the amount eligible for waiver, pending receipt from the
Government of India may be transferred by the banks to a separate
account named "Amount receivable from Government of India under
Agricultural Debt Waiver Scheme 2008", and the balance in this account
should be reflected in Schedule 9 (Advances) of the Balance Sheet. It is
now clarified that in case of 'other farmers' eligible for debt relief,
after the 'other farmer' has paid his entire share of 75%, banks may
open an account for Debt Relief Scheme, similar to the one opened for
the receivables from GOI under the Debt Waiver Scheme, and bearing the
nomenclature "Amount receivable from Government of India under
Agricultural Debt Relief Scheme 2008". This amount may also be reflected
in Schedule 9 (Advances) of the Balance Sheet.
-
Once an account has been classified as NPA,
all the facilities granted to the borrower will be treated as NPA except
in respect of Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (PACS)/Farmers Service
Societies (FSS). Also, in respect of additional facilities sanctioned as
per package finalised by BIFR and/or term lending institutions, provision
may be made after a period of one year from the date of disbursement in
respect of additional facilities sanctioned under the rehabilitation
package. The original facilities granted would however continue to be
classified as sub–standard/ doubtful, as the case may be
-
Interest on advances against term deposits,
NSCs, IVPs, KVPs and Life policies may be taken to income account on the
due date, provided adequate margin is available in the accounts. Advances
against gold ornaments, government securities and all other securities are
not covered by this exemption
-
Till the time the account is identified as
NPA, income is recognised irrespective of whether realised or not. Where
an account is identified as NPA (including Government Guaranteed NPA
Accounts) during the year, unrealised income should not be recognised for
the year. Also, interest accrued and credited to income account in the
previous year should be reversed or provided for if the same is not
realised. The finance charge component of finance income on NPA leased
assets remaining unrealised, should be reversed or provided for in the
current accounting period
-
Partial Recovery in respect of NPA accounts
should be generally appropriated against principal amount in respect of
doubtful assets till the irregularity is completely regularised
-
If the accounts of the borrowers have been
regularised before the balance sheet date by repayment of overdue amounts,
the same should be reviewed with care and without scope for subjectivity.
Where the account indicates inherent weakness on the basis of the data
available, the account should be deemed as a NPA. In other genuine cases,
the banks must furnish satisfactory evidence about the manner of
regularisation of the account to eliminate doubts on their performing
status
-
If the debits arising out of devolvement of
letters of credit or invoked guarantees are parked in a separate account,
the balance outstanding in that account also should be treated as a part
of the borrower’s principal operating account for the purpose of
application of prudential norms on income recognition, asset
classification and provisioning
-
In case of restructured accounts, the
classification of advances should be done as per master circular
-
In cases of substantial time overrun in the
projects under implementation, the asset classification, income
recognition and provisioning should be done as per master circular
-
Ordinary NPA accounts can be upgraded to
“Standard” accounts if entire arrears of Interest and Principal is paid
before 31st March
-
Fees and commissions earned by the banks as
a result of re–negotiations or rescheduling of outstanding debts should be
recognised on an accrual basis over the period of time covered by the
re–negotiated or rescheduled extension of credit
-
In cases of serious credit impairment assets
should be straightway classified as doubtful or loss asset as appropriate
if erosion in the value of security is significant; i.e., the realisable
value of the security is less than 50 per cent of the value assessed by
the bank or accepted by RBI at the time of last inspection, as the case
may be
-
If the realisable value of security, as
assessed by the bank/ approved valuers/ RBI is less than 10 per cent of
outstanding in the borrowal accounts, the existence of security should be
ignored and the asset should be straightway classified as loss asset. It
may be either written off or fully provided for by the bank
-
In the case of bank finance given for
industrial projects or for agricultural plantations etc. where moratorium
is available for payment of interest, payment of interest becomes ‘due’
only after the moratorium or gestation period is over
-
Old Industrial Projects under
implementation: Such Industrial Projects may be treated as “Standard
Asset” for a period not exceeding 2 years before the date of Completion of
the Project, as originally envisaged at the time of initial financial
closure of the Project or deemed date of completion of the Project
-
New Projects under implementation can be
classified as “Standard” assets only if both the following
conditions are satisfied:
-
The delay in commencement of
Commercial Production is not beyond 6 months (2 years in case of
infrastructure projects w. e .f. March 31st
2008) from the date of completion of the project as originally envisaged
-
Principal and interest on the loan are
regularly serviced during the six months or two years period, as the case
may be
-
In case of housing loan or similar advances
granted to staff members where interest is payable after recovery of
principal, interest need not be considered as overdue from the first
quarter onwards but only when there is default in repayment of
installments of principal or payment of interest on the respective due
dates
-
In cases of NPAs with balance of Rs.5 crore
and above stock audit at annual intervals by external agencies appointed
as per the guidelines approved by the Board would be mandatory in order to
enhance the reliability on stock valuation. Collaterals such as immovable
properties charged in favour of the bank should be got valued once in
three years by valuers appointed as per the guidelines approved by the
Board of Directors
-
In spite of charging of interest at monthly
rests Banks should continue to classify an account as NPA only if the
interest charged during any quarter is not serviced fully within 90 days
from the end of the quarter
-
In case Funded Interest is recognized as
income, a provision of equal amount should be made simultaneously i.e.
fully provided
-
In case of Takeout Finance, if the asset is
classified as NPA while taking over the asset, the branch should make
provisions treating the account as NPA from the actual date of it becoming
NPA even though the account was not in its books as on that date
ASSET CLASSIFICATION – AT A GLANCE
|
Category |
Conditions to be Satisfied |
Provision amount |
Remarks |
|
Standard Assets |
Does not disclose problem and which does not
carry more than normal risks attached to business |
Per RBI circular RBI 2009-10/209
DBOD.No.BP.BC. 58 /21.04.048/2009-10 dated November 5, 2009
-
Direct advances to Agricultural and SME@
0.25%
-
Commercial Real Estate Sector Exposure @1%
-
all other loans and advances at @0.40%
|
The revised norms would be effective
prospectively but the provisions held at present should not be reversed.
However, in future, if by applying the revised provisioning norms, any
provisions are required over and above the level of provisions currently
held for the standard category assets, these should be duly provided for |
|
Sub– Standard Assets |
Classified as NPA for a period less
than or equal to 12 months
Classification of an asset should not be upgraded merely as a result of
rescheduling, unless there is satisfactory compliance of the required
conditions at least for one year |
A general provision of 10% of total
outstanding should be made without making any allowance for ECGC guarantee
cover and securities available
Unsecured Exposures which are identified as
sub–standard would attract an additional provision of 10%
For detailed treatment of restructured
Sub–standard Assets, refer Master Circular No.DBOD.No.BP.BC.
21/21.04.048/2010-11 dated July 1,2010 |
In respect of accounts where there are
potential threats of recovery on account of erosion in the value of security
or non–availability of security and existence of other factors such as
frauds committed by borrowers, it will not be prudent for banks to first
classify them as sub–standard and then as doubtful after expiry of twelve
months from the date the account has become NPA. Such accounts should be
straightway classified as doubtful asset or loss asset, as appropriate,
irrespective of the period for which it has remained as NPA |
|
Doubtful Assets |
Remained sub– standard for a period exceeding
12 months |
100% of unsecured amount
For the secured portion, provision should be
made on the following basis:
Period for which Provision
the advance has requirement remained in (%)‘doubtful’ category
|
It has all the weaknesses inherent in that of
a sub–standard asset with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make
the collection/ liquidation in full, highly questionable and improbable, on
the basis of current known facts, conditions and values |
|
Loss Assets |
Loss asset is one where loss has been
identified by the bank, external or internal auditors or the RBI inspectors,
but the amount has not been written off (wholly or partly) |
100% of the outstanding should be provided
for/written off |
If the assessed realisable value of the
security is less than 10 per cent of the outstanding amount, the existence
of security should be ignored and the asset should be straightway classified
as loss asset |
DRAFT OF MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATION LETTER TO BE
OBTAINED FROM THE BRANCH MANAGEMENT
April X, 20XX
M/s. XYZ & Co
Chartered Accountants
Mumbai
Dear Sirs,
Sub.: Audit for the period ended 31–3–20XX
This representation letter is provided in
connection with your audit of the financial statements of _____________ branch
of _______________ BANK for the period ended 31–3–20XX for the purpose of
expressing an opinion as to whether the financial statements give a true and
fair view of the financial position of ___________ branch of _______________
BANK as of 31–3–20XX and of the results of operations for the period then ended.
We acknowledge our responsibility for preparation of financial statements in
accordance with the requirements of the Reserve Bank of India and recognised
accounting policies and practices, including the Accounting and Auditing
Standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
We confirm, to the best of our knowledge and
belief, the following representations:
-
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies which are material or
critical in determining the results of operations for the year or financial
position are set out in the financial statements and are consistent with those
adopted in the financial statements for the previous year. The financial
statements are prepared on accrual basis except as stated otherwise in the
financial statements. There are no changes in the accounting policies followed
by the branch during the current year
-
ASSETS
The branch has a satisfactory title to all
assets and there are no liens or encumbrances on the branch’s assets. The
branch has not received any legal notices from the landlords asking them to
vacate the premises that the branch is currently occupying as a lessee
-
FIXED ASSETS
The fixed assets located at the branch are
accounted at the Head Office, hence they are not reflected in the branch
financial statements and depreciation thereon shall be provided at the Head
Office
-
CAPITAL COMMITMENTS
At the balance sheet date, there were no
outstanding commitments for capital expenditure, other than as reported in
_________
-
OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
In the opinion of the management, other current
assets have a value on realization in the ordinary course of the branch’s
business which is at least equal to the amount at which they are stated in the
balance sheet
-
CASH & BANK BALANCES
The Cash balance as on 31st March, 20XX is Rs._____________
-
LIABILITIES
The branch recorded all known liabilities in the
financial statements
-
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
8.1 The branch has disclosed in notes to
the financial statements all;
-
guarantees that we have given to third parties
-
Letters of Credits (Local/Import)
-
Letters of Comfort (Local/Import)
-
Deferred Payment Credits/Guarantees
(Local/Import)
-
and all other contingent liabilities
8.2 Other than for advances, there are no
matters involving the branch in any claims in litigation, arbitration or other
disputes in which there may be some financial implications, including for
staff claim, branch rentals, municipal taxes, local levies etc. except for
those which have been appropriately included under contingent liabilities
8.3 Guarantees are disclosed net of
margins as at the year–end, and expired guarantee where the claim year has
also expired has been correctly removed from the branch return
8.4 Contingent liabilities disclosed in
the notes to the financial statements do not include any contingencies, which
are likely to result in a loss and which, therefore, require adjustment of
assets or liabilities
8.5 No cases/ legal disputes are pending
against the branch/ lodged by the branch, for which no liability has accrued/
is likely to accrue in the future
-
PROVISIONS FOR CLAIMS & LOSSES
Provision has been made in the accounts for all
known losses and claims of material amounts
-
There have been
no events subsequent to the balance sheet date that require adjustment of, or
disclosure in, the financial statements or notes thereto
-
PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT
Except as disclosed in the financial statements,
the results for the year were not materially affected by:
-
Transactions of a nature not usually
undertaken by the branch
-
Circumstances of an exceptional or
non–recurring nature
-
Charges or credits relating to prior years
-
Changes in accounting policies
-
We have made available to you all the following
latest reports on the accounts of our branch, and compliance by the branch on
the observations contained therein:
-
Previous year’s Branch Audit Report
-
Internal Inspection Reports
-
Report on any other Inspection Audit that has
been conducted during the course of the year relevant to the financial year
20XX–XX
Apart from the above, the branch has not
received any notice, show cause, inspection advice, etc. from Government of
India, Reserve Bank of India or any other monitoring or regulatory authority
of India that could have a material effect on the financial statements of the
branch during the year
-
BALANCING OF BOOKS
The books of the account are computerized and
hence the subsidiary records are automatically balanced with the relevant
control records
-
OVERDUE/ MATURED TERM DEPOSITS
All Overdue/ Matured Term Deposits are held as
Matured Term Deposits
-
ADVANCES
15.1 In respect of all the advances
against tangible securities, the branch holds evidence of existence and market
value of the relevant securities as at the year–end
15.2 All the borrowers’ account have been
categorised according to the prevalent RBI norms applicable for the year, into
Standard, Sub–standard, Doubtful or Loss assets, with special emphasis on
Non–Performing Assets (NPA)
15.3 We have examined the accounts and
applied the norms borrower–wise and not account–wise for categorising the
accounts
15.4 The classification of advances made
as at the end of the previous year has not been changed to a better
classification
15.5 No income has been adjusted/recorded
to revenue, contrary to the norms of income recognition notified by the
Reserve Bank of India; and particularly where the chances of
recovery/realisability of the income are remote
15.6 No income has been recorded on
Non–Performing Accounts other than on actual realisation
-
OUTSTANDING IN SUSPENSE/SUNDRY ACCOUNT
The year–wise/entry–wise break up of amounts
outstanding in Sundry deposits/Sundry assets as on 31–3–20xx has already been
submitted to you along with explanation of the nature of the amounts in brief
and supporting evidences relating to the existence of such amounts in the
aforesaid accounts
-
INTEREST PROVISIONS
17.1 Interest provision has been made on
deposits, etc. in accordance with the extent instructions of the Head Office
17.2 Any amount recorded as income up to the
year–end, which remains unrecovered or not realisable, has been reversed from
the respective income heads or has been debited to corresponding expenditure
head during the year
17.3 The accounting treatment as regards
reversal, if any of interest/other income recorded up to the previous year
end; and the amount reversed during the year under audit; i.e., income of
earlier years derecognised during the year has been made in accordance with
the prevalent RBI norms of Income Recognition
17.4 The interest provision for Head Office
Interest shall be made at the Head Office
-
STATIONERY
Stock of unused stationery like security papers,
cheque books, demand draft book, etc. have been produced for your physical
verification and are in order
-
LONG FORM AUDIT REPORT — BRANCH RESPONSE TO
THE QUESTIONNAIRE
In connection with the Long Form Audit Report,
complete information as regards each item in the questionnaire has been made
available to you in order to enable you to verify the same for the purpose of
your audit
-
OTHER CERTIFICATION
Duly authenticated, information as regards other
matters which, as per the bank’s letter of appointment, require certification
have been made available to you
-
GENERAL
There is no enquiry going on or concluded during
the year by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or any other Vigilance or
Investigating Agency on the branch or on its employees and no cases of Frauds
or of Misappropriation of Assets of the branch have come to the notice of the
Management during the year other than for amounts for which provisions have
already been made in the books of account
-
The provision for
non–performing assets, depreciation, provision for income tax, provision for
bonus, gratuity, etc. is made at the Head Office. Therefore the same has not
been provided in the branch accounts
-
There have been no irregularities involving
management or employees who have a significant role in the system of internal
control that could have a material effect on the financial statements
-
At the end of the year, the branch has
translated its holdings of Foreign Deposit Accounts at a notional rate of
Rs.__ to equivalent foreign currency . The difference between the notional
rate of Rs.__ and the actual rate as at the year end will be accounted for at
the Head Office
-
The financial statements are free of material
misstatements, including omissions.
-
The branch has complied with all aspects of
contractual agreements that could have a material effect on the financial
statements in the event of non–compliance. There has been no non–compliance
with requirements of regulating authorities that could have a material effect
on the financial statements in the event of non–compliance.
-
We have no plans or intentions that may
materially affect the carrying value or classification of assets and
liabilities reflected in the financial statements.
-
The other particulars required have already been
given to you and particulars and other representations made to you from time
to time are true and correct in all respects.
-
TAX AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31ST MARCH, 20XX
TAX AUDIT IN TERMS OF SECTION 44AB OF THE
INCOME–TAX ACT, 1961
The information required for the tax audit under
section 44AB of the Income–tax Act, 1961 has been made available to you in
order to enable you to verify the same for the purpose of your report thereon.
In respect of the Tax Audit under section 44AB of Income–tax Act, 1961 of
________________________ for the year ended 31st March, 20XX, we certify the
following:
PART – A
29.1 Our Permanent Account No.
_______________
29.2 The address as per the jurisdiction
of the assessee falls under section 124 of the Income–tax Act, 1961 is
_____________
29.3 The status as defined under the
Income Tax Act, 1961 is Company
PART – B
29.4 There is no change in nature of
business in current year as compared to preceding previous year
29.5 The books of account maintained by
us have been correctly disclosed in clause 9(b) of Form 3CD
29.6 Our Profit & Loss A/c. does not
include profits and gains assessable on presumptive basis under sections 44AD,
44AE, 44AF, 44B, 44BB, 44BBA, 44BBB, 172 of the Income–tax Act, 1961
29.7 The method of accounting followed is
as per clause 11(a) which has been consistently followed in the immediately
preceding previous year. There was no change in the method of accounting
employed vis–à–vis the method employed in the immediately preceding previous
year
29.8 Sum received from employee towards
contributions to any provident fund or superannuation fund or any other fund
mentioned in section 2(24)(x) which is paid/not paid within due dates to
concerned authorities under section 36(1)(va) are mentioned in Clause 16 (b)
of our Form 3CD and the same are correct
29.9 In Clause 17 of Form 3CD, there are
no other amounts of such items debited to Profit & Loss Account
29.10 No payments are made to persons
specified under section 40A(2)(b)
29.11 There is no amount of profit
chargeable to tax u/s. 41 as disclosed under clause 20 of Form 3CD
29.12 Except for the items shown under
clause 21(ii)(B), no tax, duty or other sum as referred to u/s. 43B has been
provided as at the year end
29.13 No expenditure/ income of an
earlier year has been debited/ credited to the Profit & Loss Account except to
the extent disclosed under clause 22(b) of Form 3CD
29.14 No loans or deposits of Rs20,000/-
or more have been repaid in cash other than those specified in the statement
of particulars as given in the respective clause of Form 3CD. The details of
loans or deposits of Rs20,000/- or more given in the said statement of
particulars is true and correct
29.15 Section–wise details of deduction
admissible under Chapter VI–A
No other deductions other than those mentioned
in clause 26 of Form 3CD is available to the branch
29.16 Details of non deduction,
non–payment or delay in payment of tax deducted at source to the credit of the
Central Government are given in the statement of particulars. Apart from that,
there are no other deduction, non payment or delay in payment of Tax Deducted
at Source
29.17 The other particulars required have
already been given to you and particulars and other representations made to
you from time to time are true and correct in all respects
Thanking you, we remain.
Yours faithfully,
For & on behalf of ___________ branch of _______________ BANK
Authorised Signatory
DRAFT LETTER OF REQUIREMENTS TO BE SENT TO THE
BRANCH
March X, 20XX
The Branch Manager
_____________ Bank
_____________ Branch
Mumbai
Dear Sir:
Sub.: Statutory Audit of your branch for the
year 20XX–XX
As you are aware, we have been appointed as the
Statutory Auditor to report on the accounts of your Branch for the year 20XX–XX.
In order to enable us to finalise the audit
programme and furnish our report on the audit of the accounts for the year
20XX–XX of your branch, may we request you to keep ready the
information/clarification as stated below and make the same available to our
audit team at the earliest
-
Latest reports
The following latest reports on the accounts of
your Bank, and compliance by the Bank on the observations contained therein
may be kept ready for our perusal:
-
Latest RBI Inspection Report
-
Internal/ Concurrent Audit Reports
-
Head Office Inspection Reports
-
Internal Inspection Reports
-
Revenue Audit Report (if any)
-
Income and Expenditure Control Report (if any)
-
Report on any other Inspection/Audit that may
have been conducted during the course of the year relevant to the financial
year 20XX–XX
-
Circulars in connection with accounts
Please let us have a copy of the Head Office
circulars/instructions in connection with the closing of your accounts for the
year, to the extent not communicated to us or incorporated in our letter of
appointment
-
Accounting policies
Kindly confirm whether, as compared to the
earlier year, there are any changes in the accounting policies during the year
under audit
If so, please let us have a list and a copy of
the accounting policy/ies amended by the bank during the year covered by the
current audit and compute the financial effect thereof to enable us to verify
the same
-
Balancing of Books
Kindly confirm the present status of balancing
of the subsidiary records with the relevant control accounts. In case of
differences between balances in the control and subsidiary records, please
give the details thereof and let us know the efforts being made to
reconcile/balance the same. This information may be given head–wise for the
relevant control accounts, indicating the date when the balances were last
tallied
-
Deposits
-
Please let us
have the Interest rate structure, applicable for the current year, for all
the types of deposits accepted by the branch
-
Kindly confirm having transferred Overdue/
Matured Term Deposits to Current Account Deposit. If not, details/
particulars of credit balances comprising Overdue/ Matured Term Deposits as
at the year–end which continue to be shown as Term Deposit, particularly
where the branch does not have any instructions/ communication for renewal
of such deposits from the account holder and amount of provision of interest
made on such overdue/ matured term deposits, should be separately marked out
and be kept ready for our reference
-
Advances
-
Kindly confirm whether in respect of the
advances against tangible securities, the branch holds evidence of existence
and latest market value of the relevant securities as at the year–end
-
Kindly inform the year–end status of the
accounts, particularly those which have been adversely commented upon in the
latest reports of RBI/Internal Auditors/Concurrent Auditors/Statutory
Auditors, etc. On the branch as also accounts in respect of which provisions
have been made/recommended as at the previous year–end
Information in relation to such advances accounts where provision
computed/recommended may please be prepared indicating:
-
Name of the borrower
-
Type of facility
-
*Total amount outstanding as at the year–end
(both for principal and interest) specifying the date up to which interest
has been levied and recovered
-
Particulars of securities and value on the
basis of latest report/statement
-
Nature of default and action taken
-
Brief history and present status of the
advance
-
* Provision already made/recommended
-
NPA since when (please specify the date)
* Corresponding figures for the previous
year–end may please be given
-
Kindly confirm whether the borrowers’ account
have been categorised according to the norms applicable for the year into
Standard, Sub–standard, Doubtful or Loss assets, with special emphasis on
Non–Performing Assets (NPA) and whether such classification has also been
made applicable by the branch to advances with balances of less than
Rs.25,000 each
Kindly confirm whether you have examined the accounts and applied the norms
borrower–wise and not account–wise for categorising the accounts. Please let
us have the particulars of provisions computed/ recommended in respect of
the above during the financial year under audit.
-
While preparing MOC for NPA accounts if one
account is identified as NPA, than all the other accounts also become NPA
for the same borrower should be considered.
-
A list of all advances accounts which have
been identified as bad/ doubtful accounts and where pending formal sanction
of the higher authorities, the relevant amount have not been re–classified/
re–categorised in the book of the Branch for provision/ write off. This
covers all account identified by the Branch or internal/ external auditor or
by RBI inspectors but the amount has not been written off wholly or partly
In case the Bank has recommended action against the borrowers or for
initiating legal or other coercive action for recovery of dues, a list of
such borrowers’ accounts may be furnished to us
-
Please let us have a list of borrowers’
accounts where classification made as at the end of the previous year has
been changed to a better classification, stating reasons for the same and
ensure the following classification should not be happen without a proper
explanation
|
Sr.
No. |
Classification |
|
|
|
Last
Year |
Current Year |
|
1 |
LOS |
DB1
|
|
2 |
DB2 |
DB1 |
|
3 |
DB1 |
DB1 |
|
4 |
SUB |
DB3 |
|
5 |
STD. |
DB3 |
-
Kindly also confirm whether the NPA status is
updated regularly in CBS system, and after classification as NPA no further
interest and charges should be debited in account.
-
Kindly also confirm whether any income has
been adjusted/ recorded to revenue, contrary to the norms of income
recognition notified by the Reserve Bank of India and/or Head Office
circulars issued in this regards; and particularly where the chances of
recovery/ realisablity of the income are remote
Kindly also confirm whether any income has been
recorded on Non–Performing Accounts other than on actual realization.
-
Outstanding in Suspense/ Sundry Account
Kindly let us have a year–wise/ entry–wise break
up of amounts outstanding in Suspense/ Sundry accounts as on 31–3–20XX. Kindly
explain the nature of the amounts in brief. Supporting evidences relating to
the existence of such amounts in the aforesaid accounts may be kept ready at
the branch for verification. Reasons for non–adjustment of items included in
these may be made known
-
Inter–branch/ Office Accounts/ Head Office
Account
-
Please let us have a statement of entries
(head–wise) which originated prior to the year–end at other branches, but
were responded during the period after 31–3–20XX at the branch
-
Date–wise details of debits in various
sub–heads relating to Inter–branch transactions and reasons for outstanding
amounts particularly those, which are over 30 days as at the Balance Sheet
date
-
Contingent liabilities
-
Kindly confirm whether other than for
advances, there are any matters involving the Bank in any claims in
litigation, arbitration or other disputes in which there may be some
financial implications, including for staff claim, municipal taxes, local
levies etc. If so, these may be listed for our verification, and you may
confirm whether you have included these as contingent liabilities
-
Kindly confirm whether guarantees are being
disclosed net of margins, or otherwise as at the year–end, and whether the
expired guarantee where the claim year has also expired, continue to be
disclosed in the Branch return. Please confirm specifically
-
Interest Provision
-
Kindly confirm whether interest provision has
been made on deposits etc. in accordance with the latest instruction of the
RBI/interest rate structure of the bank. A copy of such instructions/rate
structure may be made available for our scrutiny
-
Kindly confirm whether any amount recorded as
income up to the year–end, which remains unrecovered or not realisable, has
been reversed from any of the income heads or has been debited to any
expenditure head during the financial year. If so, please let us have
details to enable us to verify the same
-
Kindly confirm the accounting treatment as
regards reversal, if any of interest/other income recorded up to the
previous year–end; and the amount reversed during the year under audit;
i.e., income of earlier years derecognised during the year
-
Foreign Currency outstanding transactions
-
Kindly confirm whether amount outstanding as
at the year–end have been converted as at the year–end rates prescribed by
FEDAI. An authenticated copy of the FEDAI rates applied may be given for our
records
-
Kindly confirm the amount of inward value of
foreign currency parcels, if any, which originated prior to the year–end
from other banks, but could not be recorded as these were in transit and for
which entries were made after the year end
-
Investment/stationery
For Investment held by the branch:
-
These may be produced for physical
verification and/ or evidence of holding the same be made available
-
Stock of unused security paper stationery/
numbered forms like B/Rs, SGL forms, etc. may please be produced for
physical verification
-
It may be confirmed whether income accrued/
collected has been accounted as per the laid down procedure
-
It may be confirmed whether Investment
Valuation has been done as per the extant RBI guidelines
-
Long Form Audit Report —— Branch response to
the Questionnaire
In connection with the Long Form Audit Report,
please let us have complete information as regards each item in the
questionnaire, to enable us to verify the same for the purpose of our audit
-
Tax Audit in terms of section 44AB of the
Income–tax Act, 1961
Please let us have the information required for
the tax audit under section 44AB of the Income–tax Act, 1961 to enable us to
verify the same for the purpose of our report thereon
-
Other certification
Please furnish us the duly authenticated
information as regards other matters, which as per the letter of appointment
require certification
-
Bank Reconciliation & Confirmations
Please let us have, the duly reconciled
statements for all Nostro as well as Local bank accounts. A copy of the
year–end balance confirmation statements should also be called for and kept
ready for our review
-
Books of account and records
Kindly keep ready all the books of account and
other records like vouchers, documents, Fixed Assets Register, etc. for our
verification
We shall appreciate your kind co–operation in the
matter
Thanking you,
Yours truly,
Chartered Accountants
Advances checklist for LFAR
-
In respect of common irregularities, the
Auditors can give their comments borrower–wise in the LFAR in the format given
hereunder:
|
Name of Borrower |
Name of Branch |
Region |
IRAC Status |
Facility |
Sanctioning Authority |
Limit |
Amount o/s. as at the year end |
Irregularity No. |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
-
In respect of Column 9 above, “Irregularity
No.”, the number as given in the “Glossary to Irregularities” in Point 5,
under the head “Item” below should be given for the irregularity applicable to
respective borrower
In case the auditors feel that in spite of the
list of irregularities given below, there are some other irregularities, which
the auditor would like to bring to notice, the auditor may separately disclose
under the given head by giving “appropriate number”
For the aforesaid purpose, “appropriate number”
would mean, for example, if the auditors feels that in case of “Review/
Monitoring/ Supervision”, which has the number “4”, any additional
irregularity has to be incorporated, he may give a number after the last
number appearing in the list, such as “4.62”, and onwards. Similarly in case
of “Credit Appraisal” which has the number “1”, any additional irregularity
may be given “1.19”, and so on
-
The borrower–wise details may be given in
descending order based on the Amount outstanding
-
Glossary to irregularities
|
SN |
Remark |
|
1 |
Credit Appraisal |
|
1.1 |
Loan application not on record at Branch |
|
1.2 |
The appraisal form was not filled up correctly
and thereby the appraisal and assessment was not done properly |
|
1.3 |
Loan application is not in the form prescribed
by Head Office |
|
1.4 |
The Bank did not receive certain necessary
documents and Annexures required with the application form |
|
1.5 |
Basic documents such as Memorandum & Articles
of Association, Partnership deed, etc, which are a pre–requisite to
determine the status of the borrower, not obtained |
|
1.6 |
Certain adverse features of the borrower not
incorporated in the appraisal note forwarded to the management |
|
1.7 |
Industry/group exposure and past experience of
the Bank is not dealt in the appraisal note sent to the management for
sanction |
|
1.8 |
The level for inventory/book–debts/creditors
for finding out the working capital is not properly assessed |
|
1.9 |
Techno–economic feasibility report, which is
required to know the technical aspects of the borrower’s business, is not
obtained from Technical Cell |
|
1.10 |
Credit report on principal borrowers and
confidential report from their banks are not insisted from the borrowers |
|
1.11 |
The opinion reports of the associate and/or
sister concerns of the borrower are not scrutinized |
|
1.12 |
The opinion reports of the associate and/or
sister concerns of the borrower are not called for |
|
1.13 |
The opinion reports of the associate and/or
sister concerns of the borrower are not updated |
|
1.14 |
The opinion reports of the associate and/or
sister concerns of the borrower are not satisfactory |
|
1.15 |
The opinion reports of the associate and/ or
sister concerns of the borrower are not scrutinised/ called for/ not
updated/ not satisfactory |
|
1.16 |
The procedure/instructions of head office
regarding preparation of proposals for grant not followed |
|
1.17 |
The procedure/instructions of head office
regarding preparation of proposals for renewal of advances not followed |
|
1.18 |
The procedure/instructions of head office
regarding preparation of proposals for enhancement of limits, etc. not
followed |
|
1.19 |
No exposure limits are fixed for forward
contract for foreign exchange sales/purchase transactions |
|
2 |
Sanctioning and disbursement |
|
2.1 |
Credit facility sanctioned beyond the
delegated authority or limit of the branch |
|
2.2 |
Certain proposals were sanctioned pending
approval of higher authorities wherever required |
|
2.3 |
Ad hoc limits were granted for which
sanctions were pending since long |
|
2.4 |
Facilities were disbursed before completion of
documentation |
|
2.5 |
Facilities were disbursed without following
sanction terms |
|
2.6 |
Facilities were disbursed without any sanction |
|
2.7 |
Sanction letter was missing in the branch |
|
2.8 |
Guarantor as required in the sanction letter
was not obtained |
|
2.9 |
Required promoters stake not invested before
disbursement of loan |
|
2.10 |
Sanctions were made without proper appraisal |
|
2.11 |
Security charge not created before
disbursement as required by sanction letter/renewed letter |
|
2.12 |
Full disbursement of the facility not made |
|
2.13 |
Sanction terms were not complied with or were
not recorded |
|
2.14 |
Disbursement made without proper sanction |
|
2.15 |
Term loan was disbursed by creating the cash
credit or savings account of the borrower |
|
3 |
Documentation |
|
3.1 |
The security against which the advance was
sanctioned was not available/was not on record |
|
3.2 |
Mortgage for the property given as security is
not created |
|
3.3 |
Mortgage for the property given as security
created, was inadequate, as compared to terms of sanction |
|
3.4 |
Second charge as required, on assets is not
created in favour of the bank |
|
3.5 |
Documents of second charge on assets is not on
the record |
|
3.6 |
Documents pertaining to registration of
charges with ROC or any other concerned authority requiring charging of
assets is not obtained |
|
3.7 |
Copies evidencing lodgment of the original
conveyance/sale deeds with the Sub–Registrars for registration not on record |
|
3.8 |
Authority letter/Power of Attorney to the Bank
to collect the original documents from the Sub–Registrar not on record |
|
3.9 |
Documents pertaining to consortium advances
not yet executed/not available with bank |
|
3.10 |
Documents signed by persons not duly
authorised to sign or who have signed in other capacity accepted by the bank |
|
3.11 |
Signatures of the executants were not found on
all the pages of the documents |
|
3.12 |
Some documents on record were blank, without
signatures of Branch Manager, witnesses, or guarantors, etc. |
|
3.13 |
Revival letters in respect of documents to be
reviewed from the borrowers not received |
|
3.14 |
Guarantors have expired |
|
3.15 |
Guarantors not on record |
|
3.16 |
Guarantors not renewed |
|
3.17 |
Guarantors not assigned |
|
3.18 |
Worth of the guarantors not available |
|
3.19 |
Stamping not as per the amended Stamps Act |
|
3.20 |
Documents have become mutilated, soiled, time
barred or not obtained |
|
3.21 |
Opinion report by the field officer for the
borrowers not found on record |
|
3.22 |
“Nil Encumbrance Certificate/s” or “No Dues
Certificate/s” or “No Lien Letters” not obtained for the mortgage/s |
|
3.23 |
Advances for vehicle loans, Registration
certificate, transfer certificate, etc. not obtained |
|
3.24 |
Work completion certificate, sale deeds, share
certificates in societies, etc. not on record for housing loans |
|
3.25 |
Documents are not duly attested/signed by
concerned officials/not renewed |
|
3.26 |
The agreements for hypothecation do not
contain details regarding goods hypothecated |
|
3.27 |
Copy of Bills/receipts, on the basis of which
the amount was disbursed not found on record. For example, Vehicle Loans,
Plant & Machinery |
|
|
Charge on main &/or collateral securities not
created in terms of sanction letter |
|
|
Original security papers/sale deed/lease
deed/title deed/agreement of sale not available on record |
|
3.30 |
TDR are not discharged or renewed |
|
3.31 |
Control returns not sent to the HO |
|
3.32 |
The branch has not taken any action for not
compliance with terms of agreement |
|
3.33 |
No
documents executed for enhancement of limit/document not on record |
|
3.34 |
ECGC
Post shipment policy not obtained |
|
3.35 |
Credit
facility released without execution of all necessary documents |
|
3.36 |
Common
Seal not affixed on Letter of Comfort |
|
3.37 |
Confirm
orders for export credit not found on record for facilities released |
|
4 |
Review/Monitoring/Supervision |
|
4.1 |
The
account is frequently overdrawn |
|
4.2 |
The
account is continuously overdrawn |
|
4.3 |
The
account is overdrawn and the branches have not taken sufficient steps to
regularise the accounts promptly |
|
4.4 |
The
balance outstanding have exceeded the drawing power |
|
4.5 |
Balance
confirmation and acknowledgment of debt not obtained |
|
4.6 |
The
stock, book–debts statements not received regularly/promptly |
|
4.7 |
The
FFI/financial statements/audited statements/FFR 1 & 2/other operational
data, etc, not received regularly/promptly |
|
4.8 |
The
stock, book–debts statements, etc, not scrutinised and no suitable action is
taken |
|
4.9 |
The
FFI/financial statements/audited statements/FFR 1 & 2/other operational
data, etc, not received regularly/promptly/not scrutinised and no suitable
action is taken |
|
4.10 |
Non–moving stock is not deducted to arrive at the drawing power |
|
4.11 |
The
age–wise break–up of debtors is not found on record. The borrowers are
allowed to draw money on entire outstanding debt, which must rather be for
the recent debts as prescribed for particular industries and as per margin
prescribed in the sanction letter |
|
4.12 |
Wide
discrepancies observed in the stock statements and stock figures in the
annual audited financial statements |
|
4.13 |
No
penal interest has been charged for delay in submission of various
statements as per the terms of agreement depending upon the type of
loan/credit availed by the borrower |
|
4.14 |
Many
branches have not adhered to prescribed frequency of physical verification
of securities given against loans & advances |
|
4.15 |
Drawing
power limits are not revised as per market value of shares for advances
against security of shares |
|
4.16 |
End–use
of funds not ensured/not known funds utilised for purpose other than for
which granted |
|
4.17 |
The
projections submitted by the borrower stay far beyond the actual
performance. Further, no explanation for the same is taken from the
borrower |
|
4.18 |
Major
sale proceeds of the borrower not routed through the Bank |
|
4.19 |
Audited
statements of non–corporate borrowers having limit beyond Rs10 lakh not
received |
|
4.20 |
Renewal
proposals of advances not received on time and in many cases the limits are
not renewed |
|
4.21 |
Application of wrong rate of interest, processing charges, commission, other
charges, etc resulting in income leakage/excess booking of interest of the
Bank |
|
4.22 |
Insurance cover for stock/property is inadequate/not on record/not
renewed/not endorsed in favour of the Bank |
|
4.23 |
Inspection/physical verification of security charged, not been carried out |
|
4.24 |
Expired
bills/foreign currency sight bills which are outstanding, have not been
crystallized |
|
4.25 |
EBW
statements on write–off of overdue export bills of ECM not found on record |
|
4.26 |
Confirmation as to genuineness of export transactions not obtained from
Bank’s foreign offices/correspondents/customs department |
|
4.27 |
Import
credit, bill of entry evidencing import of goods not found |
|
4.28 |
Documents are not obtained for bills discounted under Letter of Credit |
|
4.29 |
Advances eligible for whole turnover packing credit guarantee cover of ECGC,
are not brought under its cover |
|
4.30 |
Though
government guaranteed accounts are irregular since long, the issue of
invocation of guarantee does not seem to have been considered |
|
4.31 |
Prescribed margins not maintained as per sanctions |
|
4.32 |
Allocated limits, full terms of sanctions, stock statements, inspection
reports, margin, etc. not available at monitoring branches |
|
4.33 |
For
allocated limits, inordinate delays were noticed in responding to transfer
by the allocator branch |
|
4.34 |
Regular
meetings not held with other consortium members to review the performance of
borrowers and to assess the current state of affairs/not been held as per
norms |
|
4.35 |
Individual members of consortium are not advised about quarterly operating
limits/D. P. allocated to each of them |
|
4.36 |
Minutes
of the consortium meetings not found on record/not been held as per norms |
|
4.37 |
Inspection report from the consortium members not obtained |
|
4.38 |
The
capital of the borrower has eroded/networth is negative/decreasing. Close
monitoring needs to be done |
|
4.39 |
Drawing
power is calculated wrongly and/or hence borrower allowed to enjoy excess
credit than actually eligible |
|
4.40 |
Signboard of the bank is not displayed in godown, where the
pledged/hypothecated stock is stored |
|
4.41 |
Limit
not fully utilised by borrower/No commitment charge is levied for limit not
fully utilised by the borrower |
|
4.42 |
Loan
against TDR/STDR, which is matured, is neither renewed nor credited to loan
account |
|
4.43 |
The
Stock and Debtors Audit Report not found on record. No audit has been done
for accounts of the borrower |
|
4.44 |
The
valuation report in respect of tangible security from government approved
valuer have not been obtained |
|
4.45 |
Guarantees, Opinion Reports Financial statements, IT assessment orders and
etc. of guarantor not found on record |
|
4.46 |
Opinion
report on guarantor is not obtained |
|
4.47 |
For
Small Government Sponsored loan accounts, security cover could not be
ascertained since neither any record was available at branch nor physical
verification conducted by the branch |
|
4.48 |
Pre–sanctions and/or post–sanctions inspection reports were not on record |
|
4.49 |
The
account was overdue for repayment and/or no credit was received from the
borrower for a long time |
|
4.50 |
The
borrower is absconding or deceased and legal formalities are incomplete and
there is willful default from the borrower. Either establishment was closed
or security was disposed of or no action taken by the branch |
|
4.51 |
Subsidy
claim process was incomplete or subsidy was yet to be received or needs
follow–up |
|
4.52 |
Security disposed of/Entity closed by borrower and no action taken by the
branch |
|
4.53 |
Irregularity not advised to controllers |
|
4.54 |
Letter
of subordination of deposits not taken |
|
4.55 |
Secured
and unsecured portion not segregated properly in advance return of the
branch |
|
4.56 |
Renewal
of limits was done before the receipt of financial statements |
|
4.57 |
Heavy
cash withdrawal for which consent of corporate guarantor is not taken |
|
4.58 |
Proper
valuation of stock not done/needs critical scrutiny |
|
4.59 |
Security obtained is inadequate/lower as compared to amount of
outstanding/no collateral security |
|
4.60 |
The
party was dealing with other bank also though it was not permitted |
|
4.61 |
Sticky
accounts require close follow–up by the management |
|
5 |
Bad
and doubtful advances |
|
5.1 |
The
IRAC norms for classification of advances were not followed and the same is
implemented through Memorandum of Changes by auditors during audit |
|
5.2 |
Installments were not received from the borrowers |
|
5.3 |
Interest was not received from the borrowers |
|
5.4 |
Legal
action for recovery of advances was not taken although authorised by the
Board/Controlling Authority |
|
5.5 |
Discontinuance of application of interest not followed although authorised
by the Board/Controlling Authority |
|
5.6 |
Government guarantees have expired and fresh guarantees not obtained/not
renewed |
|
5.7 |
Terms
of the BIFR scheme not complied |
|
5.8 |
Payment
from government not received although guarantees were unconditional,
irrevocable, payable on demand |
|
5.90 |
Delays
in the settlement/repayment in respect of sanctioned proposals |
|
5.10 |
The
repayment accepted in case of compromise cases inadequate vis–à–vis
value of security |
|
5.11 |
Compromise proposals pending at various levels where guarantors are local
government/outside agencies |
|
5.12 |
Copy of
Search Report not on record |
|
5.13 |
Decree
awarded but no further steps taken for recovery |
|
5.14 |
DI &
CGC claims submitted/rejected/pending data not available |
|
5.15 |
Irregular/ sticky advance not reported to the controlling authority promptly |
|
5.16 |
Compromise/ OTS proposal is recommended and is under negotiation since long
but not finalised. Suit is filed in the court/ DRT and pending to be
finalized |
|
5.17 |
ECGC
claim not submitted/lodged for recovery |
|